Links

America's Worst Newspaper

Better Newspapers

The Greenville News

The Charleston Post and Courier

The Columbia Free Times

Resources

The Common Voice

SwampFox News

SC Hotline

The State Legislature


SC BLOGS THAT ROCK

Charlie Broadway

Cracked

Faith in the Sound

Black Perspectives SC

The [Clemson] Sports Economist

Birds of a Feather

I Hate the State

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Cheerleaders for Failure

When you listen to The State on education, it's like hearing a foreign country's Minister of Propaganda. There was no accident at Chernobyl . . . there is no AIDS in South Africa . . . there's almost nothing wrong with South Carolina government-run schools. Wait, what's that last one? That can't be right.

Today's editorial from The State continues an unending campaign to pretend that children are being adequately served South Carolina's schools. The only problem is that the State Department of Education disagrees with The State.

According to the State Department of Education.

  • Over 70% of South Carolina public school 8th graders can't read and write at proficient level

  • Over 76% of South Carolina public school 8th graders can't do math at proficient level

  • Over 76% of South Carolina public school 8th graders can't do science at proficient level

  • Over 75% of South Carolina public school 8th graders can't do social studies at proficient level

  • I think those statistics are pretty grim but The State insists things are fine; after all, we're "on track to reach the national average within eight years on all significant measures of achievement."

    First of all, why is this an excuse? Eight years? If I have a son in the 6th grade, our schools will be up to mediocre in eight years? By the time he's 20, the middle schools will be up to 'mediocre,' if I believe the line of the politicians, known for their honesty and efficacy. Seriously, even if we believe the politicians, why is it okay to condemn the hundreds of thousands of children in public schools today, to a substandard education? (Answer: Because Brad Warthen's kids aren' t there.)

    Second, it's simply not the case that you can extrapolate our improvements along a decade-long timescale.

    Third, even if the public schools were improving at the glacier-like pace that editor Warthen breathlessly insists, why is it okay to deny unsatisfied taxpayers the chance to control their own child's education?

    Fourth, what about the dismal graduation rate? Even The State admits that ours is horrible. It hovers around 50% (51% according to the left-wing Urban Institute; 49% according to the centrist United Health Foundation; 53% according to the conservative Manhattan Institute). Since high school graduates typically earn about 50% more per year than drop-outs, this is a pretty big deal.

    No amount of failure will ever convince Brad Warthen and The State that our state's parents deserve more control and our state's children deserve a better deal. It's bad enough to believe that the current morass is fine-and-dandy for the next generation; actively defending the status quo of failure and suffering is despicable.

    Posted by Bill Smith at 12:05 PM | 10 comments

    Comments:
    As usual, the State defends the indefensible. As an anonymous commenter once put it," The king has no clothes." The taxes paid to the underperformers is outrageous enough, and then to have the audacity to ask taxpayers to wait another decade to see even 'mediocre' results!
    # posted by Anonymous : 9/12/2006 02:24:00 PM
     
    Anything less than drastic overhauling of the flabby public education system is an insult to taxpayers.
    It hasn't worked, it isn't working, and it won't work again!
    # posted by Anonymous : 9/12/2006 02:28:00 PM
     
    I think that The State looks at itself as being the voice of South Carolina, and feels an obligation to be a cheerleader of sorts for the school system and other important parts of our state.

    Unfortunately in this case they are very wrong.
    # posted by Anonymous : 9/12/2006 06:41:00 PM
     
    This is very true...I believe that Brad and the other girls on the board absolutely see themselves in some sort of "voice and conscience of South Carolina" role, along with a healthy dash of "we know what is best for all South Carolinians, and you should just stop worrying your little heads about things and let us tell you what your priorities should be and how your tax revenues and other resources ought to be expended." This is sheer arrogance and presumption, and it is what makes me hate this rag the most. These people have LONG since quit simply reporting the facts about ANYthing. In their minds it's clearly not about presenting facts anymore...it's about promoting an agenda. And what it does is make them do exactly what they did today in their piece on education: Deny the undeniable and defend the indefensible in support of the unsupportable. By the way, is it true that Brads' kids attend other-than-public schools? I know Bill says so, but this is too delicious. If true, WHAT a flaming HYPOCRITE! Hey Brad, I know you visit here often and post under the shadow name of "bill-fritz" special-ed guy or whatever, so what about it? Are your yard apes in private schools? The sad thing is, it is COMPLETELY believeable, and it would be SO in character for elitist know-it-alls like Cindi (with an "I" dang it!) and Brad.
    # posted by Anonymous : 9/12/2006 08:09:00 PM
     
    Schools ARE of premiere importance...which is why all the more effort should be placed on maximizing their performance. Not restructuring our education system in South Carolina is like continuing to use a life-support system that works half of the time.We don't tolerate poor performance in other aspects of our lives, why in education?
    Cindi, why do you try to promote underperformance? You practically froth at the mouth in insane rage if someone from SCRG or a similar group appears in public.
    # posted by Anonymous : 9/13/2006 02:13:00 PM
     
    I think you've hit the nail on the head by use of the word "elitist." Our current system is a sure-fine way to keep the poor from getting an education. This leftist approach to education of "staying the course" reminds me of the way my dog returns to his own vomit.
    # posted by Anonymous : 9/15/2006 09:51:00 AM
     
    The newly released test scores say it all...
    # posted by Anonymous : 9/15/2006 02:57:00 PM
     
    I love the name of this blog, says it all. The State is owned by a one of the most radical leftwing outfits in Ameica. The California company that owns it is considered too extreme even for CA standards! So, Brad Warthan feels at home but the rest of us have to suffer his arrogance, elitism, and obscene views.
    # posted by Anonymous : 9/17/2006 09:32:00 AM
     
    What is the California company that owns it? That would be interesting to know since they continually posture as being all about "South Carolina".
    # posted by Anonymous : 9/17/2006 09:54:00 AM
     
    The State is owned by McClatchy, which is based in Sacramento, CA
    # posted by Anonymous : 9/20/2006 05:08:00 PM
     
    Post a Comment

    About

    Debunking America's Worst Newspaper

    Archives

    March 2005

    April 2005

    May 2005

    June 2005

    July 2005

    August 2005

    September 2005

    October 2005

    November 2005

    December 2005

    January 2006

    February 2006

    March 2006

    April 2006

    May 2006

    June 2006

    July 2006

    August 2006

    September 2006

    October 2006

    November 2006

    December 2006